The Woke Movement and Wetico

Written by Mathew Naismith

Is the woke movement being sabotaged, distorted beyond recognition from what the woke movement initially represented?

Woke in simple terms; “alert to racial or social discrimination and injustice”, also, “aware of and actively attentive to important facts and issues (especially issues of racial and social justice)”.

To me, the initial woke movement was not about a witch hunt or destabilisation of society nor becoming communist or of any autocratic system, it was simply about awakening everyone to white oppression of coloured people. I should add that accepting child abuse socially as well was not part of the woke movement.

The woke movement to me has been hijacked, big time, by groups of people socially hateful, violent and abusing. This degree of hate, violence and abuse tells people like me that a consciousness has been severally distorted, beyond recognition to what the woke movement was about in the first place. Make no mistake, coloured people have not got this on their own, the reason why is interesting. The problem is not race, the problem is of a certain type of consciousness environment that does not discriminate what race it infests to then abuse and distort.

Now lets look at something that is called Wetico.

“More and more people are hearing about the Native American idea of the wetiko mind-virus. Wetiko—called by many different names throughout history—is at the very root of the collective madness and corresponding evil that we, as a human species, are collectively acting out on the world stage. Though wetiko is multi-dimensional, many-faceted and utterly profound, its fundamental essence is actually quite simple to understand.”

“Our true nature, our true identity—who we really are—is impervious to wetiko’s pernicious influence. Wetiko can’t take over, possess or have any effect on our true nature, which is not an object that can be manipulated or possessed by wetiko (or anything else, for that matter). For this reason, wetiko’s strategy is to set up a substitute counterfeit version—a simulation—of ourselves. It then tricks us into identifying with this fraudulent version of ourselves. Wetiko cannot stand it when we identify with our true nature as creative beings, for then it has nothing to sink its roots—and fangs—into.”

https://www.awakeninthedream.com/articles/wetiko-in-a-nutshell

Our innate consciousness or innate collective consciousness or God consciousness can't be touched by this very real virus, but our consciousness that is created from a wetiko environment can be distorted beyond recognition once infestation occurs. The cure is being aware, not retaliation or victim hood, where a certain collective consciousness acts the victim or victimiser.

No matter what race we are of, we are all being seriously threatened by this wetiko virus infestation and the cure is not acting out or acting the victim, it is of learning from the trauma of this infestation, and not suffering from this trauma because that is what this infectious virus consciousness wants you to do.

What is the woke movement today doing? Acting the victim big time while lashing out abusively and violently, in other words acting the victim while victimising.

Sophie Scholl Times Revisiting

Written by Mathew Naismith

Let this sink in, even under Nazism Sophie Scholl was allowed to attend her own persecution in court before being persecuted by authorities, not for today's Sophie Scholl's in the western world it would seem.

Sophie Scholl was a German national who belonged to a group called the White Rose during the reign of Nazism, a group opposing Nazi tyranny, persecution and oppression. I have a lot of respect for people like this and respect for any mentality willing to stand up against being persecuted, not just prosecuted, by our own countries authorities. Believe it or not, today, independent German journalists are being persecuted, not prosecuted, by German authorities, pretty much the same to what is going on around the western world at present. (1)

Even under Nazism, Sophie Scholl had the choice to attend court to defend the allegations against her and other White Rose members, not in today's Germany. Even under Nazi persecution, Sophie Scholl was allowed to attend her own persecution in court.

Is this persecution by western authorities only occurring in Germany?

I watched a lot of anti-mandate protests and pro-freedom rallies, without a doubt these hundreds of millions of people in the west where often persecuted by authorities on the spot, not prosecuted in court. I looked on while actual real life instigators/inciters were planted into the crowed to incite violence or coerce people into being violent, which by the way was never looked into by authorities. This on it's own is outright persecution by authorities. As of always, the authorities inaction's tell the real story, this is inline with the authorities and MSM reacting to a supposed 3% covid fatality rate, but not an 18%+ rise in deaths way above average after covid vaccine inoculation. (2)

MSM is now reporting on this but state that excess deaths are more to do with covid and, believe it or not, climate change. I know that not all these excess deaths are to do with the covid vaccine roll out, but a significant percentage is. The fact of the matter is it would seem that the authorities and MSM are in full swing to cover up the real cause of such a massive rise in excess deaths. (3)

So what has all this to do with Sophie Scholl times revisiting?

The more of an autocratic system our governments become a part of, the more censoring of the truth and the persecution of citizens trying to relay this truth on occurs, just like Sophie Scholl, but in this case you don't even get an opportunity to defend yourself before being persecuted, unlike the White Rose under Nazism.

So what side would Sophie Scholl take today in relation to NATO/Ukraine and Russia?

Maybe support a governing system that persecutes it's own people without the ability to be able to defend itself in court, or a country trying to liberate a people oppressed by the very same autocratic system of persecution. Russia is indeed trying to liberate a people being endlessly persecuted since 2014. I would myself say that a Sophie Scholl in this case would be on the side of the east, not the west. (4)

Why have not people reacted to a 18% plus excess deaths in the same way as a supposed 3% covid fatality rate?

Did not Hitler convince Germany to enter into yet another world war? If the western authorities and MSM told the people to support Russia instead of Ukraine, that is exactly what they would have done. Many of us may deny this but history tells us otherwise. Once a populous is blindly lead or easily coerced into autocracy by the authorities, authoritative persecution of the Sophie Scholl's of the world become reality, as we are once again clearly seeing in the world, especially the western world.

1. https://www.visiontimes.com/2022/06/26/alina-lipp-german-journalist-charged-bank-frozen-ukraine-reporting.html

2. https://vaccineimpact.com/2022/unexplained-deaths-becoming-1-cause-of-death-in-2022-in-canada-australia-and-europe-deaths-among-children-and-young-people-explode-in-europe/

3. https://www.vaccinedeaths.com/2022-11-02-excess-mortality-up-17-percent-fully-vaccinated.htm

4. https://rumble.com/vwxxi8-ukraine-on-fire.html?fbclid=IwAR2OJGT__nv_g8tmxcb2TB0WTxlmUGZ90ygnqqJz0JEfaOvaY--6VYytDqI

Rolling in the Tanks, in a Sense

Written by Mathew Naismith

“Sometimes people have to see you as the problem so they don't have to change.”

Vienna Pharaon

Most definitely. I have never seen deflective tactics used so mush as at present, especially by authorities and governments. 

Misinformation can be of unintentional abuse, where's disinformation is of intentional abuse, especially under a controlling autocratic governing system as we have experienced with the covid pandemic world wide.

https://flyingmonkeysdenied.com/2017/02/05/deflection-is-macha-conversational-control-tactic-used-to-frustrate-and-abuse/

"Deflection, by definition, is a Narcissistic Abuse tactic used to frustrate and psychologically control the mind and emotions of a targeted victim.”

This is in line with intentional abuse as opposed to unintentional abuse. Don't be conned by narcissists stating that abuse is abuse, it is not.

Narcissistic: Characteristic of those having an inflated idea of their own importance.

Now look back when autocratic governing systems are put in place, forced control over regions of the world, narcissists abound. They love there newly found control over people and are often overly abusive. You will also find that these people are all of a sudden above common law, especially under an autocratic system, which narcissists also thrive on. Their own self-importance is highly inflated further in turn creating abuse of intentions, where the abuse in indeed intentional.

You should now get an idea of why authorities and governments like this use defective tactics to an extreme, at the same time put out as much actual real life disinformation while accusing others of disinformation.

“Deflecting an argument by refusing to engage with the subject matter at hand is an age-old trick Cluster B people use on others and strive to teach their offspring to enjoy as a conversational game or strategic thinking habit.

It is typically used by Machiavellian people prone to gaslighting preferred scapegoat targets and virtually anyone who will listen to the manipulative and socially domineering speaker. This is a particular (overtly aggressive but socially passive) Narcissistic Abuse tactic.”

Machiavellianism: The political doctrine of Machiavelli: any means (however unscrupulous) can be used by a ruler in order to create and maintain his autocratic government.

How often do authorities and governments use tactics like this, even when not of an autocratic system? Now imagine this under an autocratic system, as we have presently experienced under state of emergencies, and that China at present is experiencing to an extreme. I think rolling in the tanks again in China is in line with intentional abuse caused by excessive narcissism. A true and trusted government governing for the people would never think of using force like this upon the people, but an autocratic government would not thinking twice about it, as we have seen during the covid pandemic. In a sense, we have all been rolled over by tanks, not a good sign at all.

Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum; “China is a model for many nations.” Think on this, the controller of world economics controls the world!! Making reference to any autocratic governing system, that so eagerly uses tanks on it's people, being a model for the rest of the world to follow will no doubt result in the world being rolled over even more by tanks in the future. 

 

Note: It has been stated that actual real life tanks were not used on protesters, as in 1989, but lets be honest, we have all been rolled over by tank like aggression and intentional abuse as of recent. 

Autocratic Tools of Trade

Written by Mathew Naismith

Want to know about covid vaccines and other medical approved covid treatments, HighWire.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/episode-291-deadly-protocols/

You need to look at the trigger points used. What triggered people to accept an apartheid system set up by governments? What trigger points are used to coerce a populous to embrace yet another autocratic system of government, that apartheid is often a tool of? Now look at the triggers that can reverse people being coerced in reacting to these triggers used by corporations and governments. Fear is a trigger point, what counteracts this trigger? Truth. Well no, due to truth can actually make people feel even less secure, this is why most people will most likely embrace a lie that seems to give them security, like covid vaccines, than truths that may threaten their security, like anything that is not positive of covid vaccines.

If you tell the truth, especially the honest truth, the market in this area is often quite small at the best of times, especially when the truth is demonised, mix this honest truth with comedy, the market is liable to be larger, unless comedy is also demonised, as it is today. So how do you demonise comedy and the honest truth? Make it seem that it will threaten people's security. So why doesn't everyone fall for this kind of coercive deceptive tactic? Knowing or open to the honest truth, even if it threatens our own security.

Make no mistake, when an apartheid system is introduced, an autocratic system is being implemented, being that any introduced apartheid system is a tool often used by autocratic societies, on top of using one of their favourite trigger points, fear, to introduce an accepted apartheid system. Once you have an apartheid system accepted by the majority, as we had during the covid pandemic, the way is clear to enforce an autocratic society on the populous. As of any introduced autocratic system, millions of people die, this time billions. Yes, the security an apartheid system and autocratic system creates is false and misleading for most people.

Thinking outside the square is in a real sense going outside of your own security zone. In a reality based on fear as we have today, fear is used to keep people within the square, within their security zone, that is often set up by authoritative figures trying to implement an autocratic society, where all other realities are demonised, such as religion, free speech, anything not of the type of autocratic society being introduced.

How many people in the west are supportive of a known far right autocratic controlled society, Ukraine? Our own far left wing Australian government supports this autocratic Ukraine government, now look at why. Ukraine is controlled by an autocratic system of government as well, but a right wing government that is simply seemingly being sacrificed for the good of an autocratic New World Order. The people in Ukraine need to wake up.

The use of fear and the introduction of any kind of apartheid system are but two tools used by a NWO autocratic system of governance, but two vital tools used to be able to enforce an autocratic society on the populous.

Feminine Querying Mind

 

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

When you take yin out of the equation, all you are left with is yang to formulate equations. Put in another way, when critical thinking is used in the absence of a queering mind, science stagnates or is distorted, like we have witnessed with the covid pandemic. It is like when relationships stagnate, you will notice that one element is no longer present or may not have been present in the first place. Same elements, like lustfulness, can attract each other but without the element of love, this kind of attraction is often transitory and not of genuine love, especially when one element loses it's lustfulness.

China's science is governed by a masculine energy, communism, which was not always the case, this is why a lot of their science is of western science these days, it is stolen. If this masculine governed science becomes the norm in the world, yes, science will end up stagnating, distorting. You will still have the critical mind at work but without the querying mind, the critical mind will end up stagnating and/or distorting.

You could say that the critical mind is represented by yang and the inquisitive mind yin. When the critical mind is governed by certain rules, especially masculine driven rules, what is allowed to be queried is greatly diminished. When critical thinking or the queering mind is diminished or overruled by the other, you no longer have true science. Spirituality works in the same way, especially when religion and/or church come before God, or whatever God is represented by in spirituality. Whenever in human history religion, being one element, overrules or overlords God, another element, chaos and devastation is created within a reality.

Make no mistake, eastern science was also taken by the west as being their own, when eastern science was not predominantly dominated by one element that is often driven by a masculine energy. Look at the masculine dominated parts of the world, where masculine ideologies dominate the feminine, science is distorted and religion comes before God. What religion is God of?

Critical thinking and the inquisitive mind should work in harmony together, as in any spirituality where all elements work in harmony together, not one coming before and over-lording the other. The same is with relationships. In my own personal relationship, most often for both of us the other comes first, resulting in elements working in unison together. We both realise one must look after themselves to be able to look after the other. By looking after yourself you are putting the other person first. In this relationship you look after yourself as well as each other, in the process creating a reality that is not distorted, working in prefect balance.

Notice during the covid pandemic that certain sciences and scientists were ignored, persecuted and even killed for not following certain protocols in accordance with certain masculine driven elements, such as covid vaccines will stop infections, while a pharmaceutical company like Pfizer had no scientific evidence of this to start with, as pointed out recently by a Pfizer executive. See how science is distorted when one element dominates the other!!

Be it of science, spirituality, relationships, etc, query if one elements is put before the other or dominates the other elements to see if any kind of distortion is present. Notice that the critical mind will denounce a querying mind if not of the critical minds protocol, like you are not of my religion, science or lustful desires!!

The querying mind to me is of a passive mind, a nurturing mind, therefore of feminine energy, and the critical mind of an active mind, a mind that is not nurturing but decisive, abrupt. Working in unison, both these elements bring the best out of each other, in the process creating a reality that is less distorted. When not working in unison, a distorted reality is sure to be created.

The Question of Intentional Abuse

Written by Mathew Naismith

A number of people are bewildered at how I am too open in regards to my own personal family life, especially the abusive side. The point is with people like me, if it helps one person to understand their own family and authoritative abuse, why wouldn't I?

Firstly, abuse is not abuse, there is intentional abuse and unintentional abuse to start with. I was left with a dislocated arm at 6 years old, this was not of intentional abuse. My parents did not intentionally leave me with an injury that was going to turn into something quite broken and debilitating, however, belting a child, even after they stopped breathing, is of intentional abuse. When the intention is to hurt the child, I would certainly call this intentional abuse. I remember my second eldest brother being held by he's feet while having his head bashed against the wall.

Lying to deceive to hurt someone is of intentional abuse, especially when malice or hate is the driving force. So is yelling at a child that won't listen and are abusive themselves of intentional abuse? No, even if you swore at them. We often don't listen to the whispers at the best of times, the only way to get through to people at times is to yell at them or be affirmative within our actions. Yes, affirmative action can mean physical action but as long as there is no intention for hurt, within this, there is no intentional abuse therefore there is no actual perpetrated abuse.

The funny thing is with my abusive family, is that members of my family, who accuse my wife and I being hateful, have rid themselves of everything we gave them. Almost everything they gave us we still are in possession of. My sister gave me a stuffed toy dog, my wife and I adore this stuffed dog, we even have it sit with us at dinner. My wife and I don't hate certain abusive family members, we simply dislike and won't put up with intentional abuse by anyone, why should we? You are not doing them any favours either by putting up with their intentional abuse.

Now, is authoritative abuse by our own governments, multinationals, police, etc, of intentional abuse? Yes, especially when you don't want to listen and abide by their directives pertaining to their disinformation which is of intentional hurt. Any authoritative disinformation is of intentional hurt, therefore of outright abuse.

The trick is with what is called disinformation is to look for intentional hurt within the disinformation, in other words look for the intentional abuse within the disinformation to know it to be of actual intentional abuse, not just an accusation of intentional abuse. I think medical professionals risking everything, even their lives, in prescribing covid treatments known to work is not of intentional abuse, but to outlaw covid treatments, as in Queensland Australia, is of intentional abuse in my mind.

I think someone like me would have some idea to what is of intentional and unintentional abuse, not that there is not a fine line between intentional and unintentional abuse at times.

Are NATO countries trying to intentionally hurt Russia? See what I mean!! Always look for the intentional hurt at hand, now look at the related disinformation to intentionally hurt.

Is Russia trying to intentionally hurt the Ukrainian people? A number of people would say yes, like the newly elected right wing government of Italy, as well as left wing NATO countries that want control over Russian natural resources, for obvious reasons and not just to fix the prices. It is obvious, from 2014, that the Donbass region in Ukraine needed Russian assistance. Being used as artillery practice by right wing Ukrainians is certainly a sign of intentional abuse in my mind, now look at the disinformation created from this intentional abuse.

If it of intentional abuse, be it can be a fine line at times, know it to be of disinformation, of lying to deceive to intentionally cause harm.

Russia v NATO

Written by Mathew Naismith

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v52Ms10Y3jg

Dr Jordan Peterson, a well known psychiatrist, states, “There is a bit of Hitler and Stalin in everyone”, of course most people would refute this or desire to believe this not to be so, even while embracing or even accepting an apartheid system, and a lot more, related to traits of Hitler and Stalin!! A mind conditioned to living in continuous fear is a mind easily manipulated.

Is there a bit of Stalin and Hitler in everyone, as this doc states?

Look at one perspective hear, did not the majority of covid vaccinated support and even embrace medical apartheid to start with? Now look at all the other quite accepted implemented Stalin and Hitler covid pandemic, and otherwise, apartheid implementations. You even have directives made into law that are quite notably accepted by the majority, or a majority accepted dominating minority.

So is Russia going to lose the war against NATO?

NATO has been at war with Russia since NATO'S conception to start with, so winning the war against NATO is very unlikely, however, there is more than one way to win a war. Ukraine is simply NATO'S chosen battle ground it would seem. Russia from the very start knew that it could not win a war against NATO, a war seemingly put into action by NATO in 2014.

Is Putin playing the same game as the WEF, therefore is simply apart of fixing energy prices and of killing off billions of people around the world?

https://gatesofvienna.net/2022/06/vladimir-putin-and-the-world-economic-forum/

“None of this means that Mr. Putin is definitively a captive of the WEF. He may well be playing along with the globalists for his own ends; there’s no way to tell. It’s just a reminder that we would be well-advised to keep an open mind about what is going on in the international political arena in these parlous times. There’s always a good chance that things are not what they seem.”

To me, we do indeed have an over population issue in relation to energy abundance. If you are religious, killing off God's creation through over population is sacrilegious to me. If not religious, you realise that there is only so much created or existing energy per head of people. If everyone in the world at present was bleeding abundance dry like the multinationals, in no time at all there would be no energy left to create abundance. Life can't exist without some form of energy abundance. For everyone to benefit from abundance, there has to be some kind of system based on balancing abundance with the number of people benefiting from this abundance.

It is strange that the NATO countries that are at war with Russia don't expect Russia, not just Putin by the way, to switch off the access to this energy abundance from Russia, while accepting that countries like Cuba, that are not a military threat, can be sanctioned to no end. Look at how accepted it was invading countries under false pretences by NATO countries and NATO's allies, like Iraq!!

Even with the current world population, if this energy abundance was evenly distributed around the world, everyone would benefit from this abundance. Seen as we have a small majority controlling and price fixing this energy abundance for their own benefit, the over population issue is very serious, only due to this minority group gorging itself off of this energy abundance to the extent it is. It is simple gluttony, an obvious show of a lower form of mentality which Russia could also be apart of, so the question of Russia verses NATO may be a ruse. In my own mind, I think not but it would not be the first time I have been wrong.