Just Not Into Extremist Ideologies

Apathy:

     The deadliest

weapon of

   mass destruction

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is interesting, as soon as I did not show support for Zelenky and disdain for Russia, my US views dropped significantly on my blogs, I have more German viewers than US viewers these days. Why Germans? As I have seen on various videos, German people can see too many similarities between what is occurring now and the rise of fascism in the mid 1930's. The book, Corona False Alarm written by a German doctor and professor, also make reference to this.

My viewers before hand were already limited due to not being Christian on one hand and not atheist on the other hand, I am also not into ANTIFIA, CRT, BLM, transgenderism, etc, any hate group that has links to communism, which a lot of Germans are wary of as well.

Yes, each to their own created reality while denouncing any other existing reality, by all means possible. I have lost a number of family members primarily due to not supporting communist hate groups alone, now add to this at not showing support for Zelensky!! People like me can't see any sense in supporting any kind of extremism or extremist reaction be it religious, atheist, right or left wing politics, health wise, etc. Look at the pandemic response which I showed no support for, resulting in even less views, now add to this not being covid vaccinated!!

Extremist views, reactions and ideologies simply create a distorted reality, a more desired reality that is simply man made, while at the same time denouncing and even outlawing realities that are not altogether man made, especially realities primarily based on desires and lusts. Today's book burning and censoring of any reality not created by desires and lusts to start with clearly show this.

Because I don't support a known Ukrainian fascist that has imprisoned his opposing political opponents, while stealing all their assets, I receive less views!! Look at how the Ukrainian fascists in 2014 killed Russian speaking people in a heinous way, no mass arrest of known fascists occurred. These Russian speaking people were also used as artillery targets, resulting overall in 14,000 people dead with no prosecutions. Imagine for a moment if the Russian speaking people in Ukraine did this to Ukrainian fascists!!

Sorry people, I just can't come at supporting any kind of senseless brutality driven primarily by known extremist ideologies.

Will we ever learn from the past?

Only when we stop suffering from the past. Helsinki syndrome, where the abused fall in love with their abuser, likened to people living in their suffering from the past than learning from the past. Yes, it would seem people are coerced to feel safer suffering from the abuse of the past than learning from the past, in other words avoid at all cost healing from the past therefore repeat the past over and over again to no end. Many of us are conditioned to suffer from the past than learning from the past, now threaten to take this safety blanket away from these people and see what reaction you get!!

Eastern Aspectual Mind!!

Written by Mathew Naismith

People like me were really hoping that the eastern aspectual mind of humanism was going to be a better option than the western aspectual mind had shown in the past, even though the western aspectual mind was showing real signs of collectedness and assimilation with the rest of humanity.

Not to be. I think for starters riding over unarmed civilians in tanks and flying soviet flags into battle is not a favourable sign, as live organ harvesting is not. Communism has nothing to do with collectedness and assimilation, in actuality communism is of the absence of emotional attachments to anything remotely resembling humanity, as live organ harvesting and rolling over unarmed civilians in tanks show, like in Ukraine.

So to be fair, I have seen footage of US soldiers taking pot shots at unarmed civilians and laughing about it and we know how captives can be treated. How many countries have been invaded or bombed under false pretences by the coalition forces, like having weapons of mass destruction. Be it so, these acts were suppose to be condemned by western society. Western society was seemingly becoming more civilised after centuries of uncivilised behaviour. Now for integrity. The problem with integrity is that it looked promising on the surface but underneath integrity was taking a huge blow in western society, where people would sell off their integrity to gain more wealth, higher positions and control. The level of lack of integrity seems to be right in line with the level of gain of detachment from the rest of humanity. Integrity is falling while detachments are rising like through hate groups and movement like WOKE, CRT, ANTIFA, BLM, Communism, etc.

It was also sad to see how the Olympics was supported by westerners while, for starters, live organ harvesting is going on. Not a sign from western society of boycotting the Olympics, even while China is also building even more coal fired power plants while annihilating the African rain forests. If you are going to produce higher co2 emissions, you need to look after the forests a lot better, in fact plant more natural forested areas, not demolish more natural forested areas. In truth, it would seem western society is presently actually becoming less civilised, not more. Why? Western civilisation is being coerced to forgo integrity for what they can gain, like freedom that was taken from them in the first place in relation to the pandemic. So today it matters not how people not vaccinated are treated. Ror starters, the acceptance of any kind of apartheid is an obvious regression of integrity.

As the capitalist elite have no emotional, psychical or humanitarian attachments to the common people, even though everything that they have is due to the common people, communism is the same. The popularity of communism in western society is simply a sign of regression, a state where attachments to the rest of humanity is lost once again, as of any extremism.

 

Integrity of Society

Written by Mathew Naismith

I was writing a post about dissimulation, where groups of people who think they are above human society in no way desire to simulate within common society. Being dissimulative in regards to common society is to do with deception, a concealment of obvious similarity to common society under a false appearance with the intent to deceive. Being dissimulative is not just to do with deception in regards to common society, the common people, it is do do with self-deception as well.

Dissimulative: Concealing under a false appearance with the intent to deceive

Making out that you are above common society when you owe everything you are to this common society is indeed self-deceptive, this includes material wealth, control and power, etc, obtained through common society. I would have liked to see how this high society would have acquired all their wealth, power and control without the assistance of common society. Of course to deceive yourself in this way takes one to dissimulate and the only way to dissimulate is to deceive yourself and everyone else around you, however, what is the main attribute is missing to be dissimulative, seen as to be dissimulative is to be deceptive? Integrity.

Integrity has two meanings: An undivided or unbroken completeness or totality with nothing wanting, also, moral soundness. Morality being of attributes of principles of right and wrong, a conforming to standards of rightful behaviour. Rightful behaviour takes one to be of integrity, of course wrongful behaviour takes one to be deceptive.

Are the elite forever wanting therefore of moral unsoundness? Are extremist groups like fascism, communism, religious fanatics, etc, forever wanting therefore of moral unsoundness?

I am not sure about you, but I find it most strange that so many people are attracted to anything that is of the absence of integrity, it would seem anything with integrity is unwanted even by common society. Why are so many people at present wanting to be controlled and dominated by communism? Could anyone honestly say that communism is of integrity? You would have to deceive yourself to say yes, so why the attraction? Simply, the common society are being manipulated through various deceptive means to embrace an extremism, as has always been the case of common society embracement of an extremism. Fascism is of the extreme right of politics as communism is of the extreme left.

We must realise, while being controlled and dominated by a high society of a great lack of integrity, that they would keep deceptively manipulating common society to acquire what they want, of course there is no end to this kind of wanting by high society, you must realise this. In the complete absence of integrity, there will be no end to this wanting by this high society which of the absence of integrity. Why are the so-called high society working very hard at trying to rid the world of integrity and decency? Because integrity, therefore decency, is always a threat to their forever wanting, desires and lusts therefore indecency. This high society built by the assistance of common society, quite deceptively, no longer wants to be questioned by common society. The way to do this is to coerce common society to become a society of the absence of integrity therefore decency, coerce common society into a state of wanting, lusts and desires, indecencies.

This coercion is done by coercing common society to ever be wanting, be it of material wealth or an extremism of the absence of integrity, especially if it is of the absence of integrity. Believe it or not, the common people have to be coerced to be wanting of anything of the absence of integrity.

Would you say that a lack of integrity is of a rational mind or irrational mind? The lack of integrity is of course of the irrational mind, being that deception is of an irrational attribute. Truth and honesty are of course of the rational mind, no rational mind would be this self-deceptive as the so-called high society are showing they are. Common society are coerced to be so wanting for something that seems a better way to exist, like communism, when this better way to exist will predominantly serve the high society that are forever wanting.

You would think a rational society, be it of common or high society, would seek a better way of existing that is of the presence of integrity and decency, not of the absence of integrity and decency, which shows how irrational high and common society have become in mind.

Union Abuse

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is interesting, at the same time introducing communism to the rest of the world through coercion and deception, apartheid is used in full affect.

The rest of Australia and the world should take serious note of what has gone on in Victoria Australia. Why? Because other unions in Victoria and in other states did not show any real support or even express condemnation of workers being abusively oppressed. Even if the unions in Victoria alone supported these abusively oppressed workers, the oppressive authorities in question would not have stood a chance. Other workers in Australia showed support but not the unions themselves.

So why did not all these unions stand together, especially in regards to the abusive oppression of other workers?

Communism, which is what unions, not necessarily unionists, and multinationals want to control the people and their countries even more. As China has exemplified, capitalism can be abused to the maximum while keeping oppressive communistic control over the people. The entire environment including the masses can be oppressively controlled therefore abused under this style of socialism, and it is obvious that the unions themselves want more control through the implementation of communism.

Yes, it would seem the multinationals and unions want the same thing, but do the unionists themselves? As Victoria has shown, not all unionists want what the unions themselves are trying to implement, unions being in support of multinationals becoming even more wealthier and controlling therefore oppressive, as we have seen in Victoria.

On one hand the multinationals seem to be concerned about the abuse of the natural environment, mainly global warming, but notice not of their own abuse but the people's abuse of the environment. Of course this abuse by the people, not the multinationals, was brought about by the multinationals and their lust for even more wealth and control in the first place. Under communism, multinationals will have no one to answer to, while union members will be even more oppressed, as we have seen in Victoria Australia. Yes, it would seem that unions are doing wrong to their own members in a huge way.

Usually under communism, corruption and deception is the name of the game, the primary source of control of the people, so why would anyone trust a communist regime to start with? Knowing that multinationals and unions have the same interest in mind, wealth, control and power over the people, it is astonishing that anyone would trust the present communist regime that is being implemented by unions and multinationals alike. It would seem the people have no voice at present which the Victorian government seems to have presently oppressed even further, but keep in mind that this can change quite quickly.

https://cpaml.org/post4.php?id=1632547587&catitem1=Class%20Struggle%20and%20Socialism&catid1=13

I liked how this communist unionist protest, like the BLM protests, did not end up with people being intimidated, abused, fined, shot at, pepper sprayed and arrested by police like anti-government oppression protests. Communism is the name of their game, a game we should avoid at all cost playing.

https://thefederalist.com/2014/01/13/if-you-think-communism-is-bad-for-people-check-out-what-it-did-to-the-environment/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-seventeen-globalization-communism-at-its-core_2795606.html

Where Lies Become Truths

 

                                                                                                                               Liar bird

                                                             Written by Mathew Naismith

An interesting occurrence, FaceBook seems to be banning any information that fact checks communist disinformation and misinformation. Yes, I am still on FB but for a very good reason, I am using their platform against them. They do seem to have woken up to this as well as my FB feed depicts.

I shared Del Bigtree HighWire information video on FB that fact checked the disinformation put out in relation to Ivermectin. I also shared on FB a fact check by me in relation to a government organisation, TGA, stating false and misleading information in relation to approved treatment that incorporated Ivermectin in various other countries. I was subsequently banned from using FB for 24 hours. I was quite pleased because FB reaction told me a lot, I am certainly on the right path to start with.

As you could imagine, fact checking communist disinformation is not allowed in any sense, as with a transparent government and freedom of information, as we are clearly seeing in countries like Australia. When a communist regime starts to ban various different forms of freedom of expression of information and fact checking, you know you are on the right track.

What I also find interesting under this communist regime, is that any number of people dying from covid vaccines just does not seem to matter, this is in contrast to one person dying from covid was one too many. If these deaths are not depicted on main stream and social communist media as being one too many, no amount of information other than from communist sources is accepted as being true. Now this is interesting, where the truth becomes the lie and the lie becomes the truth under fascism and communism.

“Repetition makes a fact seem more true, regardless of whether it is or not. Understanding this effect can help you avoid falling for propaganda, says psychologist Tom Stafford.

“Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”, is a law of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels. Among psychologists something like this known as the "illusion of truth" effect.”

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth

Let's be honest, the repetitive misinformation and disinformation experienced in regards to this coronavirus pandemic is certainly repetitious. The phrase lock-down is an interesting one. Lock-down was once seen as a drastic measure of further incarceration, now it is seen as a saviour by the masses. Why? Because now it is depicted as something that gives us security no matter what freedoms are sacrificed. Under fascism and communism, these freedoms taken away for a false sense of security are often never reinstated. Yes, taking away transparency, freedom of expression and information is forever more sacrificed for a false sense of security. To some of us, taking away transparency, freedom of expression and information produces far less security, not more security.

So why are not all the people subdued or coerced by psychological propaganda/programming? Is it that some people are more intelligent? Intelligence just doesn't come into, so many people I know that are intelligent have been reprogrammed without any idea of what has gone on.

I own a documentary on the science of Islam, as well as many other documentaries. Knowledge and awareness comes, for people like me, from any source that seems like a viable source, there in no bias if it is atheist, religious or otherwise, if it seems viable, it is taken as viable with no attached biases. Can intelligent people express great biases? The answer is obvious. I don't have a bias in having to have security, life is a risk, even driving a car with a security of insurance is a risk, however, mandating a medical treatment that has no security attached to it is too much of an insecurity for people like me. It really makes no sense whatsoever to make life even more riskier than it has to be.

So people attach themselves to lock-downs, unproven mask wearing and vaccines that are still in the trial process without any security whatsoever!! This is in line with the lie becoming the truth, lock-downs, unproven mask wearing and trial vaccines have seemingly replaced a true sense of security. What was once of security is all of a sudden seen as insecure and the insecure is seen as secure. The bias is of having to be secure in a life of known risks, no matter how intelligent you may seem to be. I think it comes down to being wise and practical rather than intelligent.

The Liar bird mimics other bird calls, in the process replacing truths with lies.