World Wide Apartheid

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

The rest of the world should be taking note of what is occurring in countries like Australia, where apartheid is not just accepted but embraced, through coercion of course, by so many Australian's. Any acceptance of any kind of apartheid is simply seen as subhuman to people like me, we would rather die than be part of any kind of apartheid, where concentration camps are already being built. The building of concentration camps should tell us all how long they plan to continue this apartheid, be it fully vaccinated with numerous shots or not.

Like in South Africa and Nazi Germany, anyone not of this kind of apartheid can be dealt with through changes in law as seen below, not just in regards to forced directives that apartheid often begins from. Instead of apartheid being forced upon us by fascists, apartheid has another political extremism to enforce apartheid, communism. 

Petition EN3285 - Reject Biosecurity Ammendment Bill 2021

“We are opposed to the Biosecurity Amendment (Enhanced Risk Management) Bill 2021, specifically in relation to broadening the scope of the current Biosecurity Act 2015 to include biosecurity enforcement orders upon "classes of individuals", specifically requiring them to wear specified clothing or equipment (108M), to be relocated and detained (108L), for an indefinite time (108 (2) ) and to provide body samples to the World Health Organization (108P). While we understand that these changes are meant to be imposed upon groups arriving into the country by plane or vessels, it does not expressly exclude the possibility of it also being applied to other "classes" of people such as the unvaccinated, or to certain ethnic, religious or politicosocial groups residing within Australia.”

https://www.aph.gov.au/e-petitions/petition/EN3285?fbclid=IwAR0thjqy3FLu0bbfXuJlgkFNyInevIJIJKGK0jarmQMkbJnFXgKA-ECd5cw

Pandemic Transparency

Written by Mathew Naismith

All we wanted from authorities is transparency, from the very start of this pandemic there was no transparency, in fact quite the opposite. It is not about being anti-vaccination or pro-vaccination or anti-pandemic or pro-pandemic, it is simply about transparency.

From the outset the phrase lockdown was inappropriate, a phrase associated with unruly prison inmates, a phrase that was going to instil fear, paranoia and hysteria, the very same reactions authorities should have been avoiding but instead promoted day in day out. This was at the same time the censoring of facts that were not pro-pandemic and pro-covid vaccine was implemented. The authorities and particular the main stream media and social media were being anything but transparent.

“So as a leader, set the example. Go first. Take risks with openness and honesty, and encourage team members to do the same. The benefits, including increased innovation, collaboration and quality, will be unparalleled! You won’t regret it, but you have to lead by example. Be brave!”

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbescoachescouncil/2017/11/30/why-transparency-and-honesty-matter-for-leadership/?sh=7e9e89003943

In all honesty, has the authorities, main stream media and social media fact checking set an example of transparency? Setting an example of transparency leads to collaboration, leading to people working together as one. From the outset this leading by example to encourage collaboration was never implemented, in fact quite the opposite was implemented. Was the phrase lockdown from the start going to induce collaboration? No, especially when the people of a country are not inmates of a prison system and especially unruly inmates of a prison system.

Would have a phrase like preventative isolation been more appropriate and responsible?

I think being transparent from the start would have created a much more collaborative environment between the authorities, MSM, social media fact checking and the people, instead it seems that anything but an environment of collaboration and transparency was being created. So as a leader of a country or state and a leader of media information, transparency to instil collaboration in times of a pandemic should have been paramount, instead quite the opposite was instilled.

In all honesty, and in relation to the degree of censorship, the level of transparency has actually diminished from the outset of this pandemic, not improved as a responsible body would do to instil collaboration and especially innovation.

Innovation is the creation of a new device or process resulting from study and experimentation. Was there transparency in relation to alternative medical treatments for the present strain of the coronavirus? Country and state authorities banned and even outlawed innovative medical treatments, while MSM totally denied there effectiveness, at the same time social media fact checking made sure very few facts about innovative medical treatments was being presented transparently.

Yes, it would seem from the start innovation was being suppressed, not just to do with alternative medical treatments but in relation to thinking innovatively outside of the authorities and MSM narrative.

So why are some people more accepting of the suppression of freedoms, information and transparency therefore innovation than other people? Because the other people are conditioned to being transparent therefore innovative mentally. The other people who are more innovative mentally will of course be more accepting of innovative medical treatments and information, this stands to reason, for example, are the followers of communism mentally innovative beyond the narratives of communism? Are the people who watch MSM constantly mentally innovative beyond MSM narratives? Now, are the people not under control of certain narratives going to be more naturally innovative mentally and physically?

The obvious suppression of innovative thinking therefore medical treatments seems to be at hand, enacted, through the lack of transparency.

Supplement: My father was trained in an international company to psychologically manipulate the workers under him. My father would often laugh at how easy the workers under him were so easily manipulated. When it looks like you are actually in the wrong, use deflective tactics to make it look like that your wrong is right and that the right is wrong.

Recently, union members protested outside a union office in Victoria Australia against the lack of support for basic human rights by their union. The union boss phoned a radio station and stated on air that the protesters presently outside their office where extremists, the unionists outside the union office heard this and reacted in accordance to the bizarre action of the union boss. They even ended up turning the water hoses on their union members, which by then was seen as simply protecting themselves against violent extremists.

The point is, to take the emphasis off yourself of being put in a bad light, manipulate the circumstances to deflect away from your own bad behaviour and put it on other people. I would say that the authorities, with the help of MSM and social media, were always going to instil disunion, in the process taking the emphasis off of themselves being in the bad light, being extremist in their own actions.

How many people have this psychological tactic duped? Ah, but the mind that is innovative is not so easily duped.

Union Abuse

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

It is interesting, at the same time introducing communism to the rest of the world through coercion and deception, apartheid is used in full affect.

The rest of Australia and the world should take serious note of what has gone on in Victoria Australia. Why? Because other unions in Victoria and in other states did not show any real support or even express condemnation of workers being abusively oppressed. Even if the unions in Victoria alone supported these abusively oppressed workers, the oppressive authorities in question would not have stood a chance. Other workers in Australia showed support but not the unions themselves.

So why did not all these unions stand together, especially in regards to the abusive oppression of other workers?

Communism, which is what unions, not necessarily unionists, and multinationals want to control the people and their countries even more. As China has exemplified, capitalism can be abused to the maximum while keeping oppressive communistic control over the people. The entire environment including the masses can be oppressively controlled therefore abused under this style of socialism, and it is obvious that the unions themselves want more control through the implementation of communism.

Yes, it would seem the multinationals and unions want the same thing, but do the unionists themselves? As Victoria has shown, not all unionists want what the unions themselves are trying to implement, unions being in support of multinationals becoming even more wealthier and controlling therefore oppressive, as we have seen in Victoria.

On one hand the multinationals seem to be concerned about the abuse of the natural environment, mainly global warming, but notice not of their own abuse but the people's abuse of the environment. Of course this abuse by the people, not the multinationals, was brought about by the multinationals and their lust for even more wealth and control in the first place. Under communism, multinationals will have no one to answer to, while union members will be even more oppressed, as we have seen in Victoria Australia. Yes, it would seem that unions are doing wrong to their own members in a huge way.

Usually under communism, corruption and deception is the name of the game, the primary source of control of the people, so why would anyone trust a communist regime to start with? Knowing that multinationals and unions have the same interest in mind, wealth, control and power over the people, it is astonishing that anyone would trust the present communist regime that is being implemented by unions and multinationals alike. It would seem the people have no voice at present which the Victorian government seems to have presently oppressed even further, but keep in mind that this can change quite quickly.

https://cpaml.org/post4.php?id=1632547587&catitem1=Class%20Struggle%20and%20Socialism&catid1=13

I liked how this communist unionist protest, like the BLM protests, did not end up with people being intimidated, abused, fined, shot at, pepper sprayed and arrested by police like anti-government oppression protests. Communism is the name of their game, a game we should avoid at all cost playing.

https://thefederalist.com/2014/01/13/if-you-think-communism-is-bad-for-people-check-out-what-it-did-to-the-environment/

https://www.theepochtimes.com/chapter-seventeen-globalization-communism-at-its-core_2795606.html

Reemergence of Apartheid

 

                                                                    Stop police terror

Written by Mathew Naismith

This is why people like me say do your own homework and research. Two thirds of Australians are said to agree with covid apartheid!!

Most interesting, apartheid being embraced in Australia with open arms, an apartheid once again orchestrated by a certain type of government, in this case introducing a covid vaccine apartheid.

Apartheid: A social policy or racial segregation involving political and economic and legal discrimination against people who are not Whites; the former official policy in South Africa.

“Apartheid; is characterised by authoritarian political cultures based which is based on baasskap, that in South Africa ensured dominance politically, socially, and economically by the nation's minority white population.” Bassskap being of a gentile national socialist movement.

Of course apartheid results in a police state, this results in security forces being created, often a private security force often mislabelled as police. Take note of apartheid social policy, where one undesirable group is segregated and given less rights than another group.

And so many Australians are going right a long with this, a system based on national socialist Nazi policies, however, this time orchestrated by communists. Yes, an apartheid policy has been allowed to go on in Palestine for some years now based on culture and race, in countries like Australia it is a policy of covid vaccine apartheid, were the undesirable group, the people not vaccinated, have less rights and freedoms. Of course it is the vaccinated that can still become infected and pass on a fully active infection, this is due to the vaccine seemingly only hindering serious infections in most people, in the process not allowing the immune system to weaken the infection. Why are highly vaccinated countries experiencing just as many infections while at the same time testing less people?

The scariest part is not that this type of government would implement apartheid like policies, the scariest part is that so many people are too willing to go right along with it, just like they did with the rise of Nazism.

“According to a YouGov poll published in yesterday’s Australian, two-thirds of Australians agree that people who are not vaccinated should be denied privileges that they have to date shared in common with the rest of the community.”

“The evidence for some time has been that the vaccines don’t stop you catching Covid or passing it on. They prevent the infection from being as severe as if you weren’t vaccinated. Added to that, if you’ve had Covid, then your resistance to infection is, according to the latest study I’ve seen, 7 times stronger than from a vaccine.”  

https://www.spectator.com.au/2021/09/from-vaccine-passports-to-vaccine-apartheid/

I would have to add that at least two thirds of Australians in the past have expressed a good deal of racism, so apartheid is probably hereditary socially.

We have an add in Australia called, “I've armed myself”, where you receive the covid vaccine against covid and passing on covid to the vulnerable, which it does not do. To me this is too similar to wearing a swastika, especially when it is apart of apartheid policies that are being introduced by governments. As many non-apartheid Germans faced in the 1930's, you can't rationalise with the irrational.

We Are All In This Together!!

 

Written by Mathew Naismith

Yes, we are all in this together, while so many people are happy separating one state from the other and even the communities within these states. Now we have the happy vaccinated, that are still carrying and passing on the full strain of covid, being separated from the people who are not vaccinated. Many of us see mandating vaccines that are still in the evaluation process not worth the risk, especially while there is no security of harm. On top of this again, outlaw medical treatments known to work in other countries.

“COVID-19 vaccines undergoing evaluation.”

https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-vaccines-undergoing-evaluation?fbclid=IwAR1mOGRbigytqiDX-NHbxRs8DQHLnZz58L-uHboAlXvLpamCtPzIzzLKdlI

Like with communism and fascism, we are not all in this together if we are not of communism or fascism. This is only the start people, in the future they will be able to force any harmful medical treatment they want onto the people, maybe even like China, forced live organ harvesting.

“The China Tribunal, an independent legal entity created to investigate decades of reports of China selling organs cut out of living political prisoners, concluded in its report published this week that live organ harvesting “continues to this day.”

https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2020/03/03/tribunal-chinas-live-harvesting-political-prisoner-organs-continues-day/

This is only the start of the communist oppression people, what is occurring at present is nothing. Look at what is presently occurring in countries like Australia, something we thought would never occur in countries like Australia, and this is but the beginning it would seem.

https://www.facebook.com/therealrukshan/videos/232307932183462

While in Canada; peaceful protesters are not pepper sprayed and rubber bullets used on them. The people have had enough of communist style abuse by the authorities either way.

https://www.facebook.com/therealrukshan/videos/387844576118273

In Queensland Australia, many people see the state leader as being some kind of saint, with very few infection cases and deaths therefore lock-downs.

If a common criminal wanted to look like some kind of saint, would you criminally lesson the PCR magnification cycles rates to depict very few cases therefore deaths? Instead of a heart attack or cancer patient dying with covid therefore from covid, heart attack and cancer patients die of there actual cause of death. Even in the most lock-down region in the world, Victoria Australia, the state leader is seen as some kind of saint, I should say was as this seems to be gradually changing now.

So many people in the state of Queensland are happy to be not all in this together as a nation in regards to the pandemic, but believe we should be all in this together nationally in regards to mandating vaccines that are still under evaluation and with no security. Under democracy, we are all in this together as a united nation, be it of a pandemic or trial vaccines, but under communism and fascism, there is no uniting all the people, only some of the people under communism or fascism.

I once thought, how did the German people not of Nazism feel like when Nazism was taking hold of so many other Germans, separating one kind of German from the other, now I know.

Where Lies Become Truths

 

                                                                                                                               Liar bird

                                                             Written by Mathew Naismith

An interesting occurrence, FaceBook seems to be banning any information that fact checks communist disinformation and misinformation. Yes, I am still on FB but for a very good reason, I am using their platform against them. They do seem to have woken up to this as well as my FB feed depicts.

I shared Del Bigtree HighWire information video on FB that fact checked the disinformation put out in relation to Ivermectin. I also shared on FB a fact check by me in relation to a government organisation, TGA, stating false and misleading information in relation to approved treatment that incorporated Ivermectin in various other countries. I was subsequently banned from using FB for 24 hours. I was quite pleased because FB reaction told me a lot, I am certainly on the right path to start with.

As you could imagine, fact checking communist disinformation is not allowed in any sense, as with a transparent government and freedom of information, as we are clearly seeing in countries like Australia. When a communist regime starts to ban various different forms of freedom of expression of information and fact checking, you know you are on the right track.

What I also find interesting under this communist regime, is that any number of people dying from covid vaccines just does not seem to matter, this is in contrast to one person dying from covid was one too many. If these deaths are not depicted on main stream and social communist media as being one too many, no amount of information other than from communist sources is accepted as being true. Now this is interesting, where the truth becomes the lie and the lie becomes the truth under fascism and communism.

“Repetition makes a fact seem more true, regardless of whether it is or not. Understanding this effect can help you avoid falling for propaganda, says psychologist Tom Stafford.

“Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”, is a law of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels. Among psychologists something like this known as the "illusion of truth" effect.”

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20161026-how-liars-create-the-illusion-of-truth

Let's be honest, the repetitive misinformation and disinformation experienced in regards to this coronavirus pandemic is certainly repetitious. The phrase lock-down is an interesting one. Lock-down was once seen as a drastic measure of further incarceration, now it is seen as a saviour by the masses. Why? Because now it is depicted as something that gives us security no matter what freedoms are sacrificed. Under fascism and communism, these freedoms taken away for a false sense of security are often never reinstated. Yes, taking away transparency, freedom of expression and information is forever more sacrificed for a false sense of security. To some of us, taking away transparency, freedom of expression and information produces far less security, not more security.

So why are not all the people subdued or coerced by psychological propaganda/programming? Is it that some people are more intelligent? Intelligence just doesn't come into, so many people I know that are intelligent have been reprogrammed without any idea of what has gone on.

I own a documentary on the science of Islam, as well as many other documentaries. Knowledge and awareness comes, for people like me, from any source that seems like a viable source, there in no bias if it is atheist, religious or otherwise, if it seems viable, it is taken as viable with no attached biases. Can intelligent people express great biases? The answer is obvious. I don't have a bias in having to have security, life is a risk, even driving a car with a security of insurance is a risk, however, mandating a medical treatment that has no security attached to it is too much of an insecurity for people like me. It really makes no sense whatsoever to make life even more riskier than it has to be.

So people attach themselves to lock-downs, unproven mask wearing and vaccines that are still in the trial process without any security whatsoever!! This is in line with the lie becoming the truth, lock-downs, unproven mask wearing and trial vaccines have seemingly replaced a true sense of security. What was once of security is all of a sudden seen as insecure and the insecure is seen as secure. The bias is of having to be secure in a life of known risks, no matter how intelligent you may seem to be. I think it comes down to being wise and practical rather than intelligent.

The Liar bird mimics other bird calls, in the process replacing truths with lies.

The Question of Ivermectin?

Written by Mathew Naismith

So the Australian federal government has now outlawed the use of Ivermectin as a treatment for coronavirus infections. By the way, this is the same country that is building concentration camps to keep the undesirables away from the main populous, in this case the inmates have to pay thousands of dollars to have their rights and freedoms taken away from them under false pretences. Only in a fascist or communist country are inmates in these camps made to pay in some way. This is not democracy, a governing system paid dearly for.

“Today, the TGA, acting on the advice of the Advisory Committee for Medicines Scheduling, has placed new restrictions on the prescribing of oral ivermectin. General practitioners are now only able to prescribe ivermectin for TGA-approved conditions (indications) - scabies and certain parasitic infections. Certain specialists including infectious disease physicians, dermatologists, gastroenterologists and hepatologists (liver disease specialists) will be permitted to prescribe ivermectin for other unapproved indications if they believe it is appropriate for a particular patient.

These changes have been introduced because of concerns with the prescribing of oral ivermectin for the claimed prevention or treatment of COVID-19. Ivermectin is not approved for use in COVID-19 in Australia or in other developed countries, and its use by the general public for COVID-19 is currently strongly discouraged by the National COVID Clinical Evidence Taskforce, the World Health Organisation and the US Food and Drug Administration.”

https://www.tga.gov.au/media-release/new-restrictions-prescribing-ivermectin-covid-19

“Ivermectin is currently used for about 28% of the world's population. Countries where COVID-19 mortality is close to zero may not have incentive to adopt treatments. When excluding these countries, ivermectin adoption is about 36%.” 

https://ivmstatus.com/

“claimed prevention or treatment of COVID”, when Ivermectin is used in how many countries as a prevention and cure!! This is not just claimed so this statement alone is of disinformation from the Australian government.

So according the the Australian government disinformation board, the TGA, no other country has approved/adopted the use of Ivermectin as a prevention or cure!! I would say that a country wide adoption means it has been approved. Let's now look at actual medical approvals.

“Covid cases falling in the parts of India that approved Ivermectin use.”

https://joannenova.com.au/2021/05/cases-down-in-the-parts-of-india-that-approved-ivermectin-use/

“Slovakia was the first country in the EU to approve Ivermectin for treating Covid-19 (1/28/21). Although they had distribution snags in the first few weeks, we saw a peak daily new case average number (according to Worldometer) of 2,341 in March 4th. Their last day of data (5/30) is reporting 122 cases per day (7 day average) according to Worldometer. This is a decline in daily cases of 94.55% in less than three months in a country where currently only 16% of their population is fully vaccinated.”

https://lifenotlabs.com/ivermectin-rollout/

You can't introduce a fascist or communist governing system if the people are not living in great fear and/or despair, so of course our governments have to put out insurmountable disinformation. This is what fascist and communist governments do best, lie and deceive for their own and the parties benefit, at no time for the people's benefit as we are clearly seeing today.