Written by Mathew Naismith
I have heard a family court lawyer state that abuse is abuse, while strangely disregarding the obvious differences between intentional and unintentional abuse. Snapping at my partner while in pain and tired is not of intentional abuse, especially, as I often do in this case, apologise. So no people, abuse is not abuse, like a person I know who was yelled and sworn at, on occasions when of bad behaviour as a child, thinks they were abused on the same level as children being sexually abused.
As I wrote recently in regards to Stockholm syndrome having no relative point to what is presently occurring in the world, and that there is no evidence of Stockholm syndrome existing, outside of the bank robbery in Sweden that the Stockholm syndrome was named after.
You sexually abuse a child from a young age, often if the abusers are not maliciously abusive, the child will conform, this is Stockholm syndrome. There is huge amounts of evidence this exists, especially today sadly enough. Abuse in not abuse, as there is intentional and unintentional abuse, but intentional abuse is outright abuse, this is important to remember.
Making out that you are protecting the people against a stated undesirable, even in an intentional abusive way, can lead to the abused supporting the abusers due to the abusers giving the abused a sense of security, be it of false intentions of security.
We must try to remember to look at if the abuse is intentional or unintentional, this is most important to define if the abuse is intentional or not. When a government notably does not try to reason with the people not wanting to be intentionally abused, this is usually a sign of intentional abuse. Child molesters are most often in the category of intentional abuse, as of the present abuse too often seen today that is being orchestrated by governments around the world. To me, most of the abuse I have seen by authorities today is of intentional abuse. Go figure, look at how the authorities and MSM directly support paedophilia, especially through their inaction's.
You got me writing another post Heather.
Good thoughts as always Heather.
Yes, you are right, what Stockholm syndrome directly refers to does not happen in most other cases, like in a bank robbery, look at why though. The robbers often become too abusive towards people not conditioned to being abused. Abuse the people a bit at a time and in the end they will accept being intentionally abused, this should sound familiar to all of us by now. As I understand it, the authorities in Sweden don't often put their people in a situation where the people's security is threatened. The hostages in this case probably felt secure even when under the threat of abuse from the robber. The robber where probably not trying to intentionally abuse the hostages either. I love processing this kind of material.
As it would seem during the Swedish bank robbery that the Stockholm syndrome is named after, the hostages never felt that they were going to lose their lives. Now imagine intentional abusers making out that they are the protectors of a life threatening undesirable, how they could make the abused feel secure while being abused, like with the rise of fascism and communism.
To people like me, it is too obvious that many of the intentionally abused have no idea that they are being subjected to intentional abuse as opposed to unintentional abuse. Is their any sign of a genuine apology from authorities, while at the same time degrade people who don't want to be intentionally abused? Make no mistake, it is outright intentional abuse by authorities all around the world, leading to what is called Stockholm syndrome but a syndrome creating a state that is far worse than the bank robbery in Stockholm.
Being accepting of intentional abuse is one thing while feeling secure for all the people, being accepting of intentional abuse while many people feel even more insecure is something else. All it would have taken is a little reasoning and genuine debate. The inaction here tell the true story of actual heinous intentional abuse, while so many other people look on and even applaud, as often seen with the rise of fascism and communism.
https://www.therichest.com/shocking/15-twisted-cases-of-stockholm-syndrome/
No comments:
Post a Comment