Written by Mathew Naismith
Hundreds of thousands of people around the world could have been of false positives, if this is so, this is of deliberate criminal intent. Both PCR and RA tests are of screening purposes, not diagnoses purposes as we are made to believe. I will allow the following information explain this.
Screening tests; (sometimes termed medical surveillance) is a medical test or procedure performed on members (subjects) of a defined 1 asymptomatic population or population subgroup to assess the likelihood of their members having a particular disease. 2 With few exceptions, screening tests do not diagnose the illness.
Diagnostic tests; are any type of medical test carried out to diagnose a condition, disease, or illness in people who are displaying specific signs of possible illness.
“After December 31, 2021, CDC will withdraw the request to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel, the assay first introduced in February 2020 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 only. CDC is providing this advance notice for clinical laboratories to have adequate time to select and implement one of the many FDA-authorized alternatives.”
“Rapid antigen testing is a screening tool to help detect COVID-19 in people without any symptoms of COVID-19. Rapid antigen testing involves a nasal swab (using a small cotton bud) that is placed into a chemical solution.”
https://www.nsw.gov.au/covid-19/health-and-wellbeing/rapid-antigen-testing
“But PCR tests are specific to the DNA they are testing for, whether that’s of a person or a virus, so aren’t “designed” to pick up the genetic material of the person being tested.”
Genetic material; is the medium by which instructions are transmitted from one generation of organisms to the next. The genetic material of a cell can be a gene, a part of a gene, a group of genes, a DNA molecule, a fragment of DNA, a group of DNA molecules, or the entire genome of an organism.
“In the UK, testing to see whether someone currently has Covid-19 is performed using an extremely common process called PCR, and known as a PCR test. This involves taking a swab from someone’s throat and nose, and then using PCR to detect the genetic material of the virus that causes Covid-19 (which is called SARS-CoV-2).”
https://fullfact.org/online/pcr-test-mullis/
So both PCR and RA screening tests are of swabbing. PCR tests samples are then taken to a laboratory to be analysed, this is when these tests are often magnified at 35 to 40 cycles, well above the correct 24 cycles. Would a criminal mind use these tests at higher cycles for specific gains?
“Editor’s Note: This is what several experts have been saying for months – high cycle thresholds can lead to false positives as the PCR test can replicate any DNA material. Moreover, one cannot say that a person has COVID-19 if that person exhibits no symptoms.”
https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/01/09/who-finally-admits-the-problem-of-pcr-tests/
Also look up the following, looks to be of impartial information.
https://covidcalltohumanity.org/category/burning-questions/are-the-tests-really-accurate/
Swabbing tests allow numerous other environmental elements to contaminate the sample swabbed, even contaminants from the air. Blood samples tested are more of diagnoses testing than PCR and RA tests and are most often a more accurate form of diagnoses.
“According to the guideline first released on July 21, 2020, and updated last November 30, 2020, “The PCR technology used in tests to detect viruses cannot distinguish between viruses capable of infecting cells and viruses that have been neutralized by the immune system and therefore these tests cannot be used to determine whether someone is contagious or not. RNA from viruses can often be detected for weeks (sometimes months) after the illness but that does not mean that you are still contagious.”
https://covidcalltohumanity.org/2021/05/24/sweden-pcr-cannot-be-used-for-diagnosis/
Also considering that covid vaccines are fully endorsed, even though hey have to date killed and maimed hundreds of thousands of people, and that therapeutic treatments have been banned and even outlawed in Queensland Australia, deliberate criminal intentions just doesn't cover it. Would a non-criminal mandate a medical procedure that kills and maims hundreds of thousand of people, while banning inexpensive treatments that kill and maim far less people over a much longer period of time?
We have to date several new pharmaceutical billionaires and a lot of other people becoming very wealthy as well. They are also falsely calling these people who are testing positive cases. You can't be a case if you are not contagious, of course a real medical case is of someone being actually treated for an infection and not just contagious.
No comments:
Post a Comment