Written by Mathew Naismith
So has Professor Thomas Borody's triple therapy treatment actually been approved for use in the treatment of the present coronavirus infection in Australia? Note:The PDF at the end of this post is certainly worth reading in regards to Hydroxychloqouine, very descriptive.
“The Ivermectin triple therapy seems to be the cheapest, safest, and rapidly-curing treatment for Australians, and used broadly could stimulate the Australian economy. Professor Borody says his research has led him to a triple therapy of Ivermectin, zinc and an antibiotic – which are all TGA and FDA approved.”
“No trial has shown Ivermectin-based therapy to be ineffective. In-fact, international trials report almost 100% cure rate with symptom improvement within 4-6 days. This needs to be available for aged care facilities and front line health workers today.” he said.
Yes, the drugs and supplements used in the triple therapy treatment have been approved by the Australian TGA, but the triple therapy treatment using Ivermectin, zinc and antibiotics have not!!
“Ivermectin has not received regulatory approval in Australia or by other comparable countries for use as an anti-viral treatment. Although there are some studies published either on unreferenced websites or in lower-tier medical journals, the consensus view of major regulators and in top-tier international medical journals is that the evidence for the clinical efficacy and safety of ivermectin for the treatment or prevention of COVID-19 is not strong at this stage. More evidence is required before it could be considered a safe and effective treatment option.”
https://www.tga.gov.au/covid-19-treatments-information-consumers-and-health-professionals
“Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
So the Australian government clearly states that no other comparable country has a regulative approval for Ivermectin to be used as an anti-viral treatment!! India has a huge close quartered population, the use of hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin seems to have made a huge difference. Is this more actual disinformation from the government?
“Study authors note that several regions globally now recognize this drug as both a powerful vaccine and treatment for COVID-19. The countries of South Africa, Zimbabwe, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Mexico, and India have all approved ivermectin’s use during the pandemic, according to the team.”
https://www.studyfinds.org/covid-19-cure-ivermectin/
“Much like what was successfully accomplished in India, parts of Bangladesh, and places like Argentina and Mexico, Chairman Ozaki calls for the immediate use of ivermectin as cases surge in Japan.”
So under a state of emergency, recently developed covid vaccines that have only been used for a short period of time are approved, but already approved medication used for years now are not approved under emergency use as a joint medical treatment. In fact it is obvious that everything is being done by governments not to approve already approved medication for use against the recent coronavirus infection, even under emergency powers.
So they can lock people down under these emergency powers but not approve already approved medical medication!! Why? Has anyone in government, on main stream media boards and the TGA invested in vaccine producing companies. In Queensland Australia, where therapeutic treatments have been literally outlawed, this kind of conflict of interest certainly exists.
“The largest meta analysis published in 2018, revealed only 50 cardiac deaths attributed to hydroxychloroquine in 60 plus years.5 The largest database analysis that examined this issue stated the following: The results on the risk of severe adverse events associated with short-term (1 month) HCQ treatment as proposed for COVID-19 therapy are reassuring, with no excess risk of any of the considered safety outcomes compared to an equivalent therapy.6”
“The FDA database shows a total of 640 deaths attributable to HCQ over fifty years. To put this in context “Each year the FDA receives over one million adverse event reports associated with the use of drug products” “This concerns the entirety of HCQ use over more than 50 years of data, likely millions of uses and of longer-term use than the five days recommended for Covid-19 treatment.”11 The 640 deaths represented 0.034% of all the deaths (1,910,212) attributable to medications.”
https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/White-Paper-on-HCQ-2020.pdf
We have never seen so many deaths and maiming from vaccines as of recent but this is approved, but approving treatments that are far less deadly and cost effective just don't have the same high end investment rate than vaccines. In all honesty, lets be honest here.
No comments:
Post a Comment