Written by Mathew Naismith
I am, like a number of other people, into making the best of what is instead of the worse. Can you honestly say that governments, like the Australian government, are making the best of what is and not the worse of what is?
Their modern day clinical response today is to lock up healthy people instead of the people at risk, in the process knowingly causing numerous deaths through lockdowns. Considering that over 90% of people may feel something like cold virus symptoms at best, locking down healthy people in the modern era of medicine maybe just beyond Neanderthal reasoning. They wouldn't have even thought of doing this in olden day medicine, especially considering the low fatality rate.
Governments are their to keep the country healthy therefore it's people. A healthy country is a healthy people, just like a healthy mind is a healthy body. Are governments like the Australian government keeping the country healthy? They are actually doing the opposite, making the worse of the situation as possible.
A prime example of this is not just using but forcefully denouncing any preexisting on and off the shelf medication that have been proven to work by front line doctors when administered properly, like any medication.
On top of this, promote mandatory vaccinations of vaccines that have a noticeable very high health risk. If the flu vaccine has a fatality rate of 0.6%, a higher fatality rate than covid-19,what will covid-19's fatality rate be?
In my mind, any government considering implementing a high risk mandatory vaccination is not looking after the health of the country therefore it's people.
The following video is worth watching if you are considering being vaccinated with a covid-19 vaccine.
https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-covid-vaccines-dirty-secret/
